Talk:Nuremberg Tribunal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
This is not an accurate account of the significance and development of international law. The assertion of individual responsibility for criminal acts in international law is the most important contribution made by the Nuremberg Tribunal, and it is not even mentioned here. | |||
The article, like all of these connected with post WW II legal and political order, needs to be much more firmly rooted in legal scholarship. i am not opposed to the writing of primarily historical articles, but when they are dealing with issues of law they have to be done properly. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 00:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:19, 14 November 2010
This is not an accurate account of the significance and development of international law. The assertion of individual responsibility for criminal acts in international law is the most important contribution made by the Nuremberg Tribunal, and it is not even mentioned here.
The article, like all of these connected with post WW II legal and political order, needs to be much more firmly rooted in legal scholarship. i am not opposed to the writing of primarily historical articles, but when they are dealing with issues of law they have to be done properly. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 00:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Military Developing Articles
- Military Nonstub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Law Developing Articles
- Law Nonstub Articles
- Law Internal Articles
- History tag
- Military tag