Talk:Sighthound: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleta Curry (→Related pages Instructions should stay?: new section) |
imported>Tom Morris No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:On all the other Related Articles subpages I've started and edited, I routinely delete the instructions. I think once a R.A. subpage is started, it's fairly self-evident to use the 'r' template as, ideally, the rest of the subpage uses it, and so the novice author will just copy the style of the rest of the page. --00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:30, 26 January 2009
Related pages Instructions should stay?
Hi Tom--and all
I know it says 'delete after reading' on the instructions at the Related Pages tab, but I'm thinking that's a mistake.
Unlike the instructions for the definition, for example, the next person filling in something at Related Pages might well need to read the directions, unless they're a CZ expert.
How would they know (or remember, if they're like me) to use the R| template, or what the difference between a related topic and a subtopic is?
Now that we've got Talk page instructions in order, maybe we can clean up some of the others, too.
Comments?
Aleta Curry 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- On all the other Related Articles subpages I've started and edited, I routinely delete the instructions. I think once a R.A. subpage is started, it's fairly self-evident to use the 'r' template as, ideally, the rest of the subpage uses it, and so the novice author will just copy the style of the rest of the page. --00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)