Talk:Placebo effect: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>D. Matt Innis
(→‎Reason for "might": Ah but was it the placebo effect)
Line 25: Line 25:


:::If the placebo effect always occurs, I should have been asleep. Since that was an enormous dose of an potent drug, if anything, there was a reverse placebo effect, but I don't remember fighting to stay awake.  [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 15:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
:::If the placebo effect always occurs, I should have been asleep. Since that was an enormous dose of an potent drug, if anything, there was a reverse placebo effect, but I don't remember fighting to stay awake.  [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 15:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Ah, but you are assuming that it is the clinician (and I agree that is what we have written) that is the cause of the placebo effect, but the effects are not always the result of the clinician.  It is whatever makes us believe that the intervention will work - the more elaborate the intervention, the more the placebo effect plays a role.  You are saying that you 'believed' that you were 'extremely insensitive'.  That ''could'' be an isolated anecdotal example of a placebo effect (though it could be something else as well).  It's just that ''you'' suggested it to ''yourself''.  When a patient believes that a pill will cure their arthritis, it's effects are improved by the placebo effect.  When they do not think it will cure their arthritis, its effects are diminished by the placebo effect.  In other words, the placebo effect is always a part of any treatment, but that does not mean that the entire effect is the result of the placebo effect, only a variable part of it - depending on the patient.  Most of the time the 'effect' is effective enough to overcome what amounts to 'negative beliefs', but in your case it wasn't.  Even looking at it as a 'reverse placebo effect' is accepting that there is a placebo effect which is not always positive. That is what I mean when I say that some believe that the net effect always includes the placebo effect. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 16:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:25, 10 January 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition the effect of a medical treatment that is attributable to an expectation that the treatment will have an effect [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Health Sciences and Psychology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English


House of Lords - Science and technology - Sixth Report

I think this is a really thorough and neutral explanation of the placebo effect from the source the Gareth introduced us to. D. Matt Innis 05:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Probably a little too late to absorb. Will look at it tomorrow; hopefully the forecasted blizzard doesn't get connectivity or power.

Reason for "might"

Perhaps I should copy the http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/30/6/551 reference from placebo. When I said "might", perhaps not in the most flowing way, I was thinking of their third case study, which I can make even more ethically complex. A patient presents with clinical depression, for which the clinician prescribes an appropriate antidepressant. The antidepressant is known to a 2-4 week delay before it takes effect.

The patient, however, reports immediate relief of symptoms. Now, unless there's a pharmacologic miracle, this fairly well has to be a placebo effect from a real drug. What are the ethical obligations to continue?

Take it a step further. Let's say the patient, a week later, starts complaining of known side effects from the drug. Now, what is the best ethical course? Keep the patient on a non-benign drug if it has shown benefit for the major complaint and the side effects are not intolerable? Change to a true inert medication, knowing the patient is suggestible?

Incidentally, do look at Talk:Sham treatment/Related Articles‎. Larry has some questions about the relationship among placebo, placebo effect, and sham treatment. All are related, but there's no strict hierarchy among them. Howard C. Berkowitz 05:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with all of that, but are you saying that, other than unconscious patients, there are times when the placebo effect does not occur? I know we aren't totally correct without the 'might', but how can we bring it out that, some believe that the placebo effect is part of all treatments based on the assumption that all human contact has a psychological impact. From the House of Lords above:[1]
"The placebo effect has been described as the therapeutic impact of 'non-specific' or 'incidental' treatment ingredients, as opposed to the therapeutic impact that can be directly attributed to the specific, characteristic action of the treatment."
""...we all recognise the strong placebo effect in, probably, all aspects of medical treatment, whether they are conventional or not" (Q 155). "
D. Matt Innis 07:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
No, I don't assume placebo effect will occur in all cases. My experience and observations, and I think the literature in both pain management and psychopharmacology supports it, is that suggestion may have an effect, but frequently does not. It's very common to have to try several drugs before an effective one is found.
While the singular of data is not anecdote, I was having surgery for a pilonoidal cyst, back when night-before admission was common. The anesthesiologist visited me the night before, and I told him that while I didn't need or want preoperative sedation, not to use the then-current barbiturates as I was extremely insensitive. He laughed and said he'd just use more. The morning of surgery, the nurse came in with 300mg of pentobarbital, three times the normal dose. I was a little safety-concerned, but I took it. When I was wheeled into the OR, I was awake and alert, rather to the shock of the staff.
If the placebo effect always occurs, I should have been asleep. Since that was an enormous dose of an potent drug, if anything, there was a reverse placebo effect, but I don't remember fighting to stay awake. Howard C. Berkowitz 15:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Ah, but you are assuming that it is the clinician (and I agree that is what we have written) that is the cause of the placebo effect, but the effects are not always the result of the clinician. It is whatever makes us believe that the intervention will work - the more elaborate the intervention, the more the placebo effect plays a role. You are saying that you 'believed' that you were 'extremely insensitive'. That could be an isolated anecdotal example of a placebo effect (though it could be something else as well). It's just that you suggested it to yourself. When a patient believes that a pill will cure their arthritis, it's effects are improved by the placebo effect. When they do not think it will cure their arthritis, its effects are diminished by the placebo effect. In other words, the placebo effect is always a part of any treatment, but that does not mean that the entire effect is the result of the placebo effect, only a variable part of it - depending on the patient. Most of the time the 'effect' is effective enough to overcome what amounts to 'negative beliefs', but in your case it wasn't. Even looking at it as a 'reverse placebo effect' is accepting that there is a placebo effect which is not always positive. That is what I mean when I say that some believe that the net effect always includes the placebo effect. D. Matt Innis 16:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)