Talk:Metacognition: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
Line 14: Line 14:


—[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
—[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
== Article needs content collaborators ==
I originated this article long ago, and work a little on it from time to time. It could benefit from content collaborators. —[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:34, 24 May 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Thinking about, monitoring, and regulating one’s own thinking and thinking processes; an exemplification of cognitive science. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology, Psychology and Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup categories:  Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Starting article on 'metacognition' for Jan '09 Write-a-Thon

Collaborators encouraged.

Regarding blockquotes

One hardly ever sees italicized blockquotes in books or articles. Larry has said we should not italicize them, as the blockquote template does.

One usually sees them indented, sometimes in smaller font size. I use code that calls for 0.99em, and gives three font faces in case a browser does not have the first one indicated.

I prefer 0.99em Comic Sans MS, as it sets the quote off distinctly from the main text. I employ blockquotes frequently in articles that I originate.

I wish I knew how to create a template for my code.

Anthony.Sebastian 03:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Article needs content collaborators

I originated this article long ago, and work a little on it from time to time. It could benefit from content collaborators. —Anthony.Sebastian 03:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)