Talk:Vesalius: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Brian P. Long
(→‎A few additions: new section)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
Line 17: Line 17:
Hope you're well,  
Hope you're well,  
[[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 16:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 16:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks, Brian.  Your input not only welcomed, also encouraged.  Let's have the best encyclopedia entry on the Copernicus of Anatomy. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 19:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:21, 28 August 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1514 - 1564) Flemish physician who revolutionized the field of anatomy by laying the groundwork for a new, observation-based methodology, using dissections of human cadavers. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Health Sciences and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Beginning of article on Vesalius for July Write-a-Thon 2008

Biography: life, work and times) on the Flemish anatomist/physiologist, Andreas Vesalius. --Anthony.Sebastian 12:55, 2 July 2008 (CDT)

Fonts

Anthony, I see that you give different literal quotations. They are all in a different font/size/color. Is there a system to it?--Paul Wormer 11:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

A few additions

Hi Anthony--

I've been doing some reading over the past year, and I thought we might make some additions to the Vesalius article, but wasn't sure where to begin. Do you mind if I just dive into your section on "Vesalius' Work"?

If you're interested, I've been reading Cunningham's Anatomical Renaissance. I thought his section on Galen's self-presentation was particularly interesting. Furthermore, I thought we should balance your treatment of his anatomical achievement a bit-- by mentioning, for example, that Vesalius continued to give (and draw!) the Galenic number of lobes of the liver even though he should have been able to see the correct number for himeself. I think I read a discussion of this in 'The Western Medical Tradition: 800 BC-AD 1800', ed. Conrad et al., but I'll have to check.

Hope you're well, Brian P. Long 16:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Brian. Your input not only welcomed, also encouraged. Let's have the best encyclopedia entry on the Copernicus of Anatomy. Anthony.Sebastian 19:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)