Talk:Neuroimaging: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(→‎Histology: new section)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 4: Line 4:


Please also briefly mention histology and the history of brain imaging, including classical staining (Golgi, Ramón y Cajal) and still widely used invasive techniques (e.g. cryosectioning, or tracers like 3H thymidine or DiI). -- [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 13:51, 15 August 2008 (CDT)
Please also briefly mention histology and the history of brain imaging, including classical staining (Golgi, Ramón y Cajal) and still widely used invasive techniques (e.g. cryosectioning, or tracers like 3H thymidine or DiI). -- [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 13:51, 15 August 2008 (CDT)
== Nondesctructive noninvasive, invasive, destructive ==
Rather than simply emphasizing [[in vivo]] in the lede, I wonder if these distinctions should be made more clear, and even split out to subarticles. Is neuropathology or neurohistopathology a better name for the destructive?
Is this to be resticted to the neurons themselves, or would cerebral angiography be at least related?
These appear to be CNS oriented, although I certainly could imagine functional neuroimaging of the peripheral nerves. For relatively nondestructive testing there, I've worked most with EMG/NCV, and wonder if these could be/are correlated. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 23:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:21, 29 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A group of techniques used to visualize structure and function of nervous systems, especially the vertebrate brain. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Psychology, Physics and Biology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Histology

Please also briefly mention histology and the history of brain imaging, including classical staining (Golgi, Ramón y Cajal) and still widely used invasive techniques (e.g. cryosectioning, or tracers like 3H thymidine or DiI). -- Daniel Mietchen 13:51, 15 August 2008 (CDT)

Nondesctructive noninvasive, invasive, destructive

Rather than simply emphasizing in vivo in the lede, I wonder if these distinctions should be made more clear, and even split out to subarticles. Is neuropathology or neurohistopathology a better name for the destructive?

Is this to be resticted to the neurons themselves, or would cerebral angiography be at least related?

These appear to be CNS oriented, although I certainly could imagine functional neuroimaging of the peripheral nerves. For relatively nondestructive testing there, I've worked most with EMG/NCV, and wonder if these could be/are correlated. Howard C. Berkowitz 23:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Neuroimaging&oldid=495959"