Talk:Geometry/Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Lyall Easthope (Question about format of definition.) |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→Format of definition: See CZ:Definition) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should the definition be in italics or in plain text? Should the double apostrophes in the template be left or removed? The instructions in the template should answer this. Thanks, ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 10:25, 24 May 2008 (CDT) | Should the definition be in italics or in plain text? Should the double apostrophes in the template be left or removed? The instructions in the template should answer this. Thanks, ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 10:25, 24 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
: Doesn't it reference [[CZ:Definition]]? Oh well. There are quite a few templates that use the /Definition subpage, and we wouldn't want to duplicate the documentation on all of them. Wouldn't hurt to link to [[CZ:Definition]], though. If ''that'' page doesn't answer these questions (italics, etc) it should be modified to do so. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 16:48, 24 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 24 May 2008
Format of definition
Should the definition be in italics or in plain text? Should the double apostrophes in the template be left or removed? The instructions in the template should answer this. Thanks, ... Peter Lyall Easthope 10:25, 24 May 2008 (CDT)
- Doesn't it reference CZ:Definition? Oh well. There are quite a few templates that use the /Definition subpage, and we wouldn't want to duplicate the documentation on all of them. Wouldn't hurt to link to CZ:Definition, though. If that page doesn't answer these questions (italics, etc) it should be modified to do so. J. Noel Chiappa 16:48, 24 May 2008 (CDT)