CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0010/Member position statements: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards (New page: {{ECDiscussRules}} == Original Member position statements == {{Editorial Council}}) |
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Original Member position statements == | == Original Member position statements == | ||
# '''[[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]]:''' This proposal is supposed to only adopt the [[CZ:Proposals/Recipes_Subpage_and_Accompanying_Usage_Policy]] in principle. That, in turn, will be guided by the policy stated at [[CZ:Recipes]]. Therefore, all the members who wish to modify those may do so at the respective talk pages and also further when [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] forms the designated group for its implementation. The discussions on Resolution 0009 should only state arguments in favor or against adopting the said proposal in principle. | |||
{{Editorial Council}} | |||
{{Editorial Council}} | {{Editorial Council}} |
Revision as of 04:07, 9 May 2008
Rules
This page contains the official positions of Citizendium Editorial Council Members about Editorial Council Resolution 0010.
The governing rules for discussion are found at Editorial Council Rules of Procedure. The following are reminders.
- Council Members should place their comments, limited to 600 words maximum, underneath their names on this page. Comments will be ordered based on when they first appeared on this page; new comments should simply be appended to the bottom.
- Members may edit their comments throughout the discussion period.
- Each Member will be required to read this page before voting.
- There are other methods of commentary on the resolution, but no commentary is required reading for Members other than this page.
- This page will be closed for editing when voting begins.
- The closing date for position statements can be found on the resolution page and will be announced on cz-editcouncil, followed by reminders. Note that Members may move to extend discussion.
Original Member position statements
- Supten Sarbadhikari: This proposal is supposed to only adopt the CZ:Proposals/Recipes_Subpage_and_Accompanying_Usage_Policy in principle. That, in turn, will be guided by the policy stated at CZ:Recipes. Therefore, all the members who wish to modify those may do so at the respective talk pages and also further when Hayford Peirce forms the designated group for its implementation. The discussions on Resolution 0009 should only state arguments in favor or against adopting the said proposal in principle.
The Editorial Council was merged with the Management Council into a single governing body in 2013. All EC rules and decisions were upheld
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List Archives • Resolutions • Log • Essential Policy •Rules of Procedure • How to Make a Resolution
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List Archives • Resolutions • Log • Essential Policy •
The Editorial Council was merged with the Management Council into a single governing body in 2013. All EC rules and decisions were upheld
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List Archives • Resolutions • Log • Essential Policy •Rules of Procedure • How to Make a Resolution
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List Archives • Resolutions • Log • Essential Policy •