Talk:Culture jamming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Christopher J. Reiss No edit summary |
imported>Christopher J. Reiss No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it. Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs. [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT) | I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it. Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs. [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Keep in mind, we don't use acronyms or phrases here; there is no "NPOV" or "POV" policy, but articles should be relatively neutral and unbiased. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:48, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Gotcha. A good policy, to prevent "in-speak", the first step towards cabalism. Old habits die hard i guess. [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 12:50, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:50, 12 March 2008
"Often with considerable finesse and cleverness"--that's debatable, isn't it? --Larry Sanger 14:20, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
It does seem a bit POV, let me soften it ...Christopher J. Reiss 15:10, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it. Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs. Christopher J. Reiss 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
- Keep in mind, we don't use acronyms or phrases here; there is no "NPOV" or "POV" policy, but articles should be relatively neutral and unbiased. --Robert W King 12:48, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
Gotcha. A good policy, to prevent "in-speak", the first step towards cabalism. Old habits die hard i guess. Christopher J. Reiss 12:50, 12 March 2008 (CDT)