Talk:Stone: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Robert W King |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Core Article == | |||
Hi Robert, | |||
"Stone" is listed under the Earth Sciences core articles. Wonna claim the point? I'm ready to OK it. --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 03:02, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Yesh. I've got a bunch actually. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 05:20, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
==Granite== | |||
Granite is compressed quartz and other materials, it is not a stone itself, but is a combination of the stone. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08:48, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
:??? er... Ok. Granite, in geology, is the name of a intrusive, igneous, acidic natural rock. E.g., "El Capitan" or the "Half Dome" at Yosemite or the "Monte Bianco / Mont Blanch" in the Alps are made of granite. But it is well possible that some engineered stone is commercially called "granite". This is a problem between rocks and building stones, so for example, commercially, "granite" includes all intrusive rocks from granites to gabbros, and some metamorphic rocks as migmatites and gneisses. | |||
:If there are engineered stones called granites it is correct to report the fact, but we must specify how they are different from natural granite. We should probably also make distinctions between granite as a rock, as a building stone (commercial term) and as engineered stone. The plot thickens... --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 08:57, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Does my edit suffice? --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:02, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::Yes, this does it. | |||
:::A very fancy solution would be to provide a table of equivalence between rocks, commercial names of natural stones, and engineered stones with the same name. The two terms I know are used with different meanings by geologists and stone dealers are "granite" and "marble" (which they generally use also for limestones). This requires of course some bibliographic research. But for engineered rocks I am totally helpless! --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 09:09, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
==References== | |||
Insert potential references on stone/construction/engineered stone below: | |||
*http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/bsi/84-2_e.html |
Latest revision as of 21:05, 30 October 2007
Core Article
Hi Robert, "Stone" is listed under the Earth Sciences core articles. Wonna claim the point? I'm ready to OK it. --Nereo Preto 03:02, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yesh. I've got a bunch actually. --Robert W King 05:20, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
Granite
Granite is compressed quartz and other materials, it is not a stone itself, but is a combination of the stone. --Robert W King 08:48, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
- ??? er... Ok. Granite, in geology, is the name of a intrusive, igneous, acidic natural rock. E.g., "El Capitan" or the "Half Dome" at Yosemite or the "Monte Bianco / Mont Blanch" in the Alps are made of granite. But it is well possible that some engineered stone is commercially called "granite". This is a problem between rocks and building stones, so for example, commercially, "granite" includes all intrusive rocks from granites to gabbros, and some metamorphic rocks as migmatites and gneisses.
- If there are engineered stones called granites it is correct to report the fact, but we must specify how they are different from natural granite. We should probably also make distinctions between granite as a rock, as a building stone (commercial term) and as engineered stone. The plot thickens... --Nereo Preto 08:57, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
- Does my edit suffice? --Robert W King 09:02, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, this does it.
- A very fancy solution would be to provide a table of equivalence between rocks, commercial names of natural stones, and engineered stones with the same name. The two terms I know are used with different meanings by geologists and stone dealers are "granite" and "marble" (which they generally use also for limestones). This requires of course some bibliographic research. But for engineered rocks I am totally helpless! --Nereo Preto 09:09, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
References
Insert potential references on stone/construction/engineered stone below:
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Developing Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Architecture Developing Articles
- Architecture Nonstub Articles
- Architecture Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Architecture Underlinked Articles