Talk:Abraham: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael J. Formica (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Mythology== | |||
You can keep this article neutral while avoiding offending a whole host of people by deleting the phrase "in Biblical mythology" and replace it instead with simply "in the [[Bible]]." I highly recommend changing this wording because as it stands it does carry a whiff of inherent bias against traditional Judaism/Christianity. [[User:Michel van der Hoek|Michel van der Hoek]] 22:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I agree, and have replaced it with what seems more neutral simply placing him in the Old Testament. | |||
:Also, I've moved " He is also regarded by historians as the founder of [[monotheism]]." to this talk page. While I might accept an expert author saying this as an individual, generic "historians" is not, in my mind, adequate sourcing. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:07, 5 February 2010
Mythology
You can keep this article neutral while avoiding offending a whole host of people by deleting the phrase "in Biblical mythology" and replace it instead with simply "in the Bible." I highly recommend changing this wording because as it stands it does carry a whiff of inherent bias against traditional Judaism/Christianity. Michel van der Hoek 22:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, and have replaced it with what seems more neutral simply placing him in the Old Testament.
- Also, I've moved " He is also regarded by historians as the founder of monotheism." to this talk page. While I might accept an expert author saying this as an individual, generic "historians" is not, in my mind, adequate sourcing. --Howard C. Berkowitz 00:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)