Evidence-based medicine/Approval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (changed ToA data by copy and paste, this is now Version 1.1) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (restore first approval and mention why the version number points to the wrong date) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{Approval | |||
| cat1 = Health Sciences | |||
| cat2 = Healing Arts | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| article url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Evidence-based_medicine&oldid=100434892 | |||
| subpage url = | |||
| cluster = | |||
| now =16 January 2009 | |||
| ToA editor = Gareth Leng | |||
| ToA editor2 = Supten Sarbadhikari | |||
| ToA editor3 = Robert Badgett | |||
| date =23 January 2009 | |||
| A editor = | |||
| A editor2 = | |||
| A editor3 = | |||
}} | |||
{{Approval | {{Approval | ||
| Line 16: | Line 33: | ||
}} | }} | ||
I noticed that the version number ToApprove points to the current Approved version. I assume it should point to this [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Evidence-based_medicine/Draft&oldid=100499186 version] that includes [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Evidence-based_medicine%2FDraft&diff=100499186&oldid=100440214 these edits] that are Robert's. That means that this would be a three editor approval and everything looks okay. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:28, 1 July 2009
| Gareth Leng nominated the version dated 16 January 2009 of this article for approval. Two other editors supported the approval (Supten Sarbadhikari and Robert Badgett). The Health Sciences Workgroup and Healing Arts Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, 23 January 2009. |
| Robert Badgett 14:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC) nominated the version dated 1 June 2009 of this article for approval. Two other editors supported the approval (Supten Sarbadhikari and Gareth Leng 11:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)). The Health Sciences Workgroup and Healing Arts Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, 1 July 2009 - This is now Version 1.1. |
I noticed that the version number ToApprove points to the current Approved version. I assume it should point to this version that includes these edits that are Robert's. That means that this would be a three editor approval and everything looks okay. D. Matt Innis 23:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)