Talk:Demographic transition/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(call it history)
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Demographic transition
==APPROVED Version 1.0==  
|                cat1 = Health Sciences
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Demographic_transition&oldid=100179472 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
|                cat2 = Economics
Well, we have another undiscussed change of which workgroups this article belongs to. As I approved it with a particualr configuration of disciplines, I do not take kindly to anyone altering those AFTER it has been approved. I should like it to be reverted and possibly changed with some discussion. This is particualrly strange, since the article was written and, I suppose, also categorised by Richard Jensen.--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 19:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
|                cat3 = Sociology
:I wrote this as a history article and it should be so categorized. There is no "health sciences" in it--that was Nancy's doing because I wanted the category "demography" and she insisted that be part of her "health sciences" so I gave in. So if there is no objection I will change Health Science to History. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:45, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
|          cat_check = n
::I have done so. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 20:15, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 09:11, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
::I wrote this as a history article and it should be so categorized. There is no "health sciences" in it--that was Nancy's doing because I wanted the category "demography" and she insisted that be part of her "health sciences" so I gave in. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:43, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 19:15, 8 October 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The theory that societies progress from a premodern regime of high fertility and high mortality to a postmodern regime of low fertility and low mortality. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Economics and Sociology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

APPROVED Version 1.0

Well, we have another undiscussed change of which workgroups this article belongs to. As I approved it with a particualr configuration of disciplines, I do not take kindly to anyone altering those AFTER it has been approved. I should like it to be reverted and possibly changed with some discussion. This is particualrly strange, since the article was written and, I suppose, also categorised by Richard Jensen.--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 19:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

I wrote this as a history article and it should be so categorized. There is no "health sciences" in it--that was Nancy's doing because I wanted the category "demography" and she insisted that be part of her "health sciences" so I gave in. So if there is no objection I will change Health Science to History. Richard Jensen 19:45, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
I have done so. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 20:15, 8 October 2007 (CDT)