Talk:Associated Legendre function: Difference between revisions
imported>Dan Nessett |
imported>Paul Wormer (→Move of equation: new section) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: Nice formating. Thanks for catching the <math>\sin\theta</math> problem. Also, I agree it is better to explicitly provide the integration by parts formula, rather than expecting the reader to already know it. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 00:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | : Nice formating. Thanks for catching the <math>\sin\theta</math> problem. Also, I agree it is better to explicitly provide the integration by parts formula, rather than expecting the reader to already know it. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 00:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Move of equation == | |||
I moved the dif. eq. from the proof page to the main article and put the definition of the assleg's on the proof page. I did this because the proof does not use the dif. eq., but uses the definition of the assleg's. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:24, 6 September 2009
Started from scratch, because (as so often) the Wikipedia article contains many duplications.--Paul Wormer 10:08, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
Added link to proof of orthogonality and derivation of normalization constant
I added a link to a proof of the first integral equation in the Orthogonality relations section Dan Nessett 16:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Formattting of proof
I formatted the proof somewhat to my taste (which is mainly determined by a careful reading of Knuth's the TeXbook). Most of my changes are self-explanatory. I added the integration by parts formula, because it was not clear at all where the u and the v' came from. Further
--Paul Wormer 12:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nice formating. Thanks for catching the problem. Also, I agree it is better to explicitly provide the integration by parts formula, rather than expecting the reader to already know it. Dan Nessett 00:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Move of equation
I moved the dif. eq. from the proof page to the main article and put the definition of the assleg's on the proof page. I did this because the proof does not use the dif. eq., but uses the definition of the assleg's. --Paul Wormer 09:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles