Talk:Analytic Hierarchy Process: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
({{checklist)
imported>Louis F. Sander
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


This article is under development as part of a specific academic project, and may therefore seem incomplete at times. For example, the references are presented in a temporarily brief form, important sections may be temporarily missing, etc. If you have something to add to the article, please discuss it here first. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 07:58, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
This article is under development as part of a specific academic project, and may therefore seem incomplete at times. For example, the references are presented in a temporarily brief form, important sections may be temporarily missing, etc. If you have something to add to the article, please discuss it here first. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 07:58, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
:It's getting a lot closer to being a complete article, but still be patient, and still please discuss proposed changes here. (The references went from crap to dynamite, IMHO. Also the Wikipedia article is entirely crap, so here's a place where we're definitely ahead.) [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 00:01, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:01, 20 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Analytic Hierarchy Process"
Workgroup category or categories Engineering Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup, Business Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 23:34, 20 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article is under development as part of a specific academic project, and may therefore seem incomplete at times. For example, the references are presented in a temporarily brief form, important sections may be temporarily missing, etc. If you have something to add to the article, please discuss it here first. Louis F. Sander 07:58, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

It's getting a lot closer to being a complete article, but still be patient, and still please discuss proposed changes here. (The references went from crap to dynamite, IMHO. Also the Wikipedia article is entirely crap, so here's a place where we're definitely ahead.) Louis F. Sander 00:01, 21 August 2007 (CDT)