User:Aleksander Stos/ComplexNumberAdvanced: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
(reorg)
imported>Aleksander Stos
m (minor)
Line 59: Line 59:




===Complex roots===
==Complex roots==
Any non-constant [[polynomial]] with complex coefficients has a complex root. This result is known as the [[Fundamental Theorem of Algebra]]. Consequently, any complex polynomial of degree ''n'' has exactly ''n'' roots (counted with multiplicities).  In particular, the equation
Any non-constant [[polynomial]] with complex coefficients has a complex root. This result is known as the [[Fundamental Theorem of Algebra]]. Consequently, any complex polynomial of degree ''n'' has exactly ''n'' roots (counted with multiplicities).  In particular, the equation
:<math>z^n=a</math>,  
:<math>z^n=a</math>,  
where ''z'' is the variable and ''a'' a non-zero constant has exactly ''n'' solutions. They are called ''n''<sup>th</sup> (complex) ''roots'' of ''a''. If ''a'' is written in the exponential form, <math>a=re^{i\theta},</math> then  the ''n'' roots of ''a'', denoted as <math>z_0,z_2,\ldots,z_{n-1}</math>, are given by  
where ''z'' is the variable and ''a'' a non-zero constant has exactly ''n'' solutions. They are called ''n''<sup>th</sup> (complex) ''roots'' of ''a''. If ''a'' is written in the exponential form, <math>a=re^{i\theta},</math> then  the ''n'' roots of ''a'', denoted as <math>z_0,z_2,\ldots,z_{n-1}</math>, are given by  
:<math> z_k = \sqrt[n]{r}\exp\left (i \left(\frac{\theta+2k\pi}{n}\right)\right),\quad k=0,1,\ldots,n-1. </math>
:<math> z_k = \sqrt[n]{r}\exp\left (i \left(\frac{\theta+2k\pi}{n}\right)\right),\quad k=0,1,\ldots,n-1. </math>
It follows that the roots form a regular n-sided polygon centered at the origin.
It follows that the roots form a regular n-sided polygon centred at the origin. Particularly important are the roots of unity, i.e. solutions of <math>z^n=1</math>.
In particular,  the cubic roots of 1 (with n=3) are {<math>1, -\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, -\frac{1}{2}-i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} </math>}.
The cubic roots of 1 (with n=3) are {<math>1, -\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, -\frac{1}{2}-i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} </math>} and for n=4 we have :{<math>\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},\, \frac{1}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},\,
-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},\, -\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},\, </math>}.


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 09:04, 13 August 2007

This is an experimental draft. For a brief description of this project click here.

Definition

Complex numbers are defined as ordered pairs of reals:

Such pairs can be added and multiplied as follows

  • addition:
  • multiplication:

with the addition and multiplication is the field of complex numbers. From another of view, with complex additions and multiplication by real numbers is a 2-dimesional vector space.

To perform basic computations it is convenient to introduce the imaginary unit, i=(0,1).[1] It has the property Any complex number can be written as (this is often called the algebraic form) and vice-versa. The numbers a and b are called the real part and the imaginary part of z, respectively. We denote and Notice that i makes the multiplication quite natural:

The square root of number in the denominator in the above formula is called the modulus of z and denoted by ,

We have for any two complex numbers and

  • provided

For we define also , the conjugate, by Then we have

  • provided

Geometric interpretation

Complex numbers may be naturally represented on the complex plane, where corresponds to the point (x,y), see the fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Graphical representation of a complex number and its conjugate

The modulus is just the distance from the point and the origin. More generally, is the distance between the two given points. Furthermore, the conjugation is just the symmetry with respect to the x-axis.

Trigonometric and exponential form

As the graphical representation suggests, any complex number z=a+bi of modulus 1 (i.e. a point from the unit circle) can be written as for some So actually any (non-null) can be represented as

where r traditionally stands for |z|.

This is the trigonometric form of the complex number z. If we adopt convention that then such is unique and called the argument of z.[2] The equality of two complex numbers and is equivalent to and for certain integer k. Graphically, the number is the (oriented) angle between the x-axis and the interval containing 0 and z. Closely related is the exponential notation. If we define complex exponential as

then it may be shown that

Consequently, any (non-zero) can be written as

with the same r and as above.

This is called the exponential form of the complex number z.[3] It is well-adapted to perform multiplications. Indeed, for any and we have

  • provided

The following particular case of complex multiplication is well-know as the de Moivre formula [4]

Fig 2. Multiplication by amounts to rotation by 90 degrees.

Graphically, multiplication by a constant complex number amounts to the rotation by and the homothety of ratio r. In particular, the multiplication by i amounts to the rotation by the right angle (counter-clockwise), see Fig. 2.


Complex roots

Any non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has a complex root. This result is known as the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Consequently, any complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots (counted with multiplicities). In particular, the equation

,

where z is the variable and a a non-zero constant has exactly n solutions. They are called nth (complex) roots of a. If a is written in the exponential form, then the n roots of a, denoted as , are given by

It follows that the roots form a regular n-sided polygon centred at the origin. Particularly important are the roots of unity, i.e. solutions of . The cubic roots of 1 (with n=3) are {} and for n=4 we have :{}.

References

  1. in some applications it is denoted by j as well.
  2. In literature the convention is found as well.
  3. The equivalence of two complex numbers can be checked as in the trigonometric form case.
  4. It is commonly used to linearise powers of trigonometric functions in integrals.