Talk:Neoclassical Schools (1871-today): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Neoclassical Schools (1871-today)
|                cat1 = Economics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:João Prado Ribeiro Campos|J. R. Campos]] 02:07, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
}}


== A puzzlement ==
== A puzzlement ==
Line 21: Line 11:
It would seem a pity to delete an article into which so much work has gone, but one must sympathise with the previous comment: it is probably fully intelligible only to those already familiar with the concepts referred to.
It would seem a pity to delete an article into which so much work has gone, but one must sympathise with the previous comment: it is probably fully intelligible only to those already familiar with the concepts referred to.


I suggest that we review the situation when the article on the History of Economic Thought (which at present draws no distinction between classical and neoclassical) has been revised.
I suggest that we review the situation when the article on the History of Economic Thought (which at present has no "neoclassical" heading, but covers some of the same ground under the heading of "The Marginalist Revolution") has been revised.


[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 05:32, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 05:32, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:04, 11 November 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  School of economic theory that flourished from about 1890 until the advent of Keynesian Economics, which asserted that market forces always would lead to efficient allocation of resources and full employment. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

A puzzlement

Though I am interested in economics, and listen to Marketplace on NPR every evening, I cannot make any sense of this article -- I'm thinking it needs both a more general introduction and clearer organization -- many too many subheads! -- Just a thought from a Literature prof! Russell Potter 22:52, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

The scope of the article

The opening sentence suggests that the article includes everything that happened in economics since 1871. The inaccuracy of that statement becomes evident only when the reader has scanned the text.

It would seem a pity to delete an article into which so much work has gone, but one must sympathise with the previous comment: it is probably fully intelligible only to those already familiar with the concepts referred to.

I suggest that we review the situation when the article on the History of Economic Thought (which at present has no "neoclassical" heading, but covers some of the same ground under the heading of "The Marginalist Revolution") has been revised.

Nick Gardner 05:32, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Neoclassical_Schools_(1871-today)&oldid=23661"