Talk:Sun Tzu: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
(test new version of {{acronym}} template)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral {{acronym|POV}}.
I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral {{acronym|POV}}.
--[[User:David Marcoe|David Marcoe]] 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
--[[User:David Marcoe|David Marcoe]] 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 22:11, 14 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition ( 544–496 BC ) Author of The Art of War (Chinese: 兵法), an immensely influential ancient Chinese book on military strategy [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Military, Philosophy and Literature [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral — (The Constabulary has removed an initialism here. Please use plain English instead, for example, "biased" ) —. --David Marcoe 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)