Talk:Republican Party (United States), history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Gregory J. Kohs
Line 2: Line 2:


The article is entirely by CZ editor Richard Jensen, who wrote portions for Wiki as rjensen.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 02:17, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
The article is entirely by CZ editor Richard Jensen, who wrote portions for Wiki as rjensen.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 02:17, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
== "Party System" emphasis seems odd ==
Why does this article focus so heavily on a construction centering on the "Third Party System", "Fourth Party System", etc.?  I studied American History in college (magna cum laude) and graduate school (through C.Phil status), and I never encountered this construction.  I'm not saying it's wrong, of course -- just not a familiar way of describing the GOP.  No? -- [[User:Gregory J. Kohs|Gregory J. Kohs]] 20:05, 27 February 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 21:05, 27 February 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The history of one of two major contemporary political parties in the United States of America. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Politics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

The article is entirely by CZ editor Richard Jensen, who wrote portions for Wiki as rjensen.Richard Jensen 02:17, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

"Party System" emphasis seems odd

Why does this article focus so heavily on a construction centering on the "Third Party System", "Fourth Party System", etc.? I studied American History in college (magna cum laude) and graduate school (through C.Phil status), and I never encountered this construction. I'm not saying it's wrong, of course -- just not a familiar way of describing the GOP. No? -- Gregory J. Kohs 20:05, 27 February 2008 (CST)