User talk:Eric Winesett: Difference between revisions
imported>Aleta Curry (→Film Workgroup: new section) |
imported>Aleta Curry (→Mr. D. Duck: quack!) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST) | You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST) | :So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::Now you ''know'' I have to be nosy about this one. [Running to do 'search' on D. Duck!] [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 14:21, 15 November 2007 (CST) | |||
== Film Workgroup == | == Film Workgroup == | ||
Yes, desperately needed. What to do??? [[user:Aleta_Curry#Film, TV, etc.|Chat about this]] [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 14:19, 15 November 2007 (CST) | Yes, desperately needed. What to do??? [[user:Aleta_Curry#Film, TV, etc.|Chat about this]] [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 14:19, 15 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 15 November 2007
Hi, Eric-- I will try to expand on the articles I've started but just haven't had the time yet. I never intended for any to remain stubs indefinitely.--Greg Lawrence 19:42, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Being bold
Thank you very much for your encouraging comments at Talk:Contraception (medical methods)/Draft. What I've been doing is going ahead and editing in any changes (small or large) except those which I think have a significant risk of being rejected by others. Perhaps I need to adjust that: only those with a larger risk of being rejected could be suggested first on the talk page, while those with a smaller risk of being rejected could be edited in and then reverted (with explanation) by others if necessary. My habits might be based on a misunderstanding that I and some others had earlier, that reverting was against the rules; I think it turned out that it was only reverting without explanation that was against the rules. So perhaps I can be bolder in general. Yes, some of the changes you did were the same as some things I had suggested; others were different. I only went through the article once so there may have been things I missed. I agree with you that an article should have things like subject-verb agreement fixed before approval. --Catherine Woodgold 07:35, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
Film--media or visual arts or what?
Hi Eric--where did you initiate the discussion of what category popular movies were to go into? I've broken down and joined the CZ forums.... Aleta Curry 00:08, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
On vacation
I am on vacation, possibly without internet access, until June 16th. --Eric Winesett 00:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
Write-a-thon, again!
Hi, Eric! You've been busy with the core articles, cool! Are you coming to the party? Aleta Curry 06:08, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
Mr. D. Duck
You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --Robert W King 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST)
- So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --Eric Winesett 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST)
- Now you know I have to be nosy about this one. [Running to do 'search' on D. Duck!] Aleta Curry 14:21, 15 November 2007 (CST)
Film Workgroup
Yes, desperately needed. What to do??? Chat about this Aleta Curry 14:19, 15 November 2007 (CST)