Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
No edit summary
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = telephone newspaper
 
|               cat1 = Engineering
 
|               cat2 = Media
==Approval?==
|               cat3 =
Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of [[CZ:Approval_Process]], however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with <nowiki>[{ToApprove}}</nowiki> --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
|           cat_check = n
 
|             status = 1
:Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
|         underlinked = y
 
|             cleanup = y
::I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval.  I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing.  Other than that, I think it's fabulous!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]]
 
}}
Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at [[telephone newspaper]] (lower case)?  It's not a proper name, is it? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::Since the wiki capitalizes everything (or, I should say, handles things the same either way), I'd prefer to have this article stay as it is. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 13:26, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::::Well, lower-casing article titles is a common practice on MediaWiki wikis, because it makes it much easier to interlink articles.  We do not have to write <nowiki>[[Telephone Newspaper|telephone newspaper]]</nowiki> when linking to an article in passing; we simply write [[telephone newspaper]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
 
:::::I'm happy to abide by the general practice; it just feels odd to type the lowercase title, even knowing it will display with a capitalized first word.  A hangover from the print era, I'm sure.  Thanks also for doing the approval mechanics here -- looks great!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 17:20, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
 
== Congrats! ==
 
Congratulations to the Media Workgroup, Thomas H. White, Russell Potter, and everyone else involved.  The first approved Media article! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
 
==APPROVED Version 1.0==
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Telephone_newspaper/Draft&oldid=100100873 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>

Latest revision as of 22:12, 13 January 2008

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A telephone-based news service in the first years after market introduction of the telephone. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Engineering and Media [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English


Approval?

Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at telephone newspaper (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --Larry Sanger 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Since the wiki capitalizes everything (or, I should say, handles things the same either way), I'd prefer to have this article stay as it is. Russell Potter 13:26, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
Well, lower-casing article titles is a common practice on MediaWiki wikis, because it makes it much easier to interlink articles. We do not have to write [[Telephone Newspaper|telephone newspaper]] when linking to an article in passing; we simply write telephone newspaper. --Larry Sanger 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm happy to abide by the general practice; it just feels odd to type the lowercase title, even knowing it will display with a capitalized first word. A hangover from the print era, I'm sure. Thanks also for doing the approval mechanics here -- looks great! Russell Potter 17:20, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

Congrats!

Congratulations to the Media Workgroup, Thomas H. White, Russell Potter, and everyone else involved. The first approved Media article! --Larry Sanger 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

APPROVED Version 1.0