Pronoun: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
("why" is not a pronoun; copyediting and correcting this entry; see talk page)
imported>John Stephenson
(linking and an example)
Line 1: Line 1:
In modern English, '''pronouns''' can function as substitutes for both proper and common [[nouns]]. For example, "me," "you," "he," "they", "this," "myself," "themselves," are all pronouns.  Within functional linguistics, however, pronouns are described as a separate set of words, since pronouns in English have additional functions beyond those of ordinary nouns; for instance the pronoun "who" has an objective case, "whom," whereas ordinary nouns in English no longer take this case.
In modern [[English language|English]], '''pronouns''' can function as substitutes for both proper and common [[nouns]]. For example, ''me'', ''you'', ''he'', ''they'', ''this'', ''myself'' and ''themselves'' are all pronouns.  Within functional [[linguistics]], however, pronouns are described as a separate set of [[word]]s, since pronouns in English have additional functions beyond those of ordinary nouns; for instance the pronoun ''who'' has an [[objective case|objective]] [[case (linguistics)|case]], ''whom'', whereas ordinary nouns in English no longer take this case. In this way, pronouns should not be seen as simple substitutes for full nouns, as these examples show:
 
:1. There's Fred!
 
:2. *There's him!
 
'*' indicates that what follows is unacceptable in the exemplifying language. In the two examples above, no pronoun can occupy the position filled by ''Fred''.





Revision as of 22:57, 19 April 2007

In modern English, pronouns can function as substitutes for both proper and common nouns. For example, me, you, he, they, this, myself and themselves are all pronouns. Within functional linguistics, however, pronouns are described as a separate set of words, since pronouns in English have additional functions beyond those of ordinary nouns; for instance the pronoun who has an objective case, whom, whereas ordinary nouns in English no longer take this case. In this way, pronouns should not be seen as simple substitutes for full nouns, as these examples show:

1. There's Fred!
2. *There's him!

'*' indicates that what follows is unacceptable in the exemplifying language. In the two examples above, no pronoun can occupy the position filled by Fred.


Personal pronouns

Possessive pronouns

Demonstrative pronouns

Interrogative pronouns

Reflexive pronouns