Talk:Neuroeconomics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Tribe
mNo edit summary
 
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}


I've marked this as a stub because most of the content is lists of papers, journals, schools, etc. related to Neuroeconomics, but doesn't really explain the subject. The part which does explain is still just a stub.
[[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 16:43, 1 June 2007 (CDT)


==Style conventions==
 
dummy edit)
I should very much like to see it extended, although I am poorly qualified for the purpose. But I am concerned by what seems to be economics'  excessive reliance upon elaborate mathematical deduction from untested introspective postulates (such as occurs , for example in utility-based theories).
Neuroeconomics could help to drag the profession back towards the real world. (A hint at the way that neuroscience can be allied with economics appears in Daine Coyle's ''The Soulful Science'' (p128) where she attempts to modify the utility function using the findings of prospect theory.) - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 02:56, 5 February 2008 (CST)

Latest revision as of 02:56, 5 February 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Interdisciplinary study which examines the role of the brain when we evaluate decisions, categorize risks and rewards, and interact with each other. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Economics, Psychology and Health Sciences [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

I've marked this as a stub because most of the content is lists of papers, journals, schools, etc. related to Neuroeconomics, but doesn't really explain the subject. The part which does explain is still just a stub. Anthony Argyriou 16:43, 1 June 2007 (CDT)


I should very much like to see it extended, although I am poorly qualified for the purpose. But I am concerned by what seems to be economics' excessive reliance upon elaborate mathematical deduction from untested introspective postulates (such as occurs , for example in utility-based theories). Neuroeconomics could help to drag the profession back towards the real world. (A hint at the way that neuroscience can be allied with economics appears in Daine Coyle's The Soulful Science (p128) where she attempts to modify the utility function using the findings of prospect theory.) - Nick Gardner 02:56, 5 February 2008 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Neuroeconomics&oldid=18123"