Talk:Diploma mill: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
m (checklist)
imported>Frank van Geelkerken
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Law workgroup? ==
Why is this article in the law workgroup?<br>
It is not even remotely related to law.
{{checklist
{{checklist
|                abc = Diploma mill
|                abc = Diploma mill

Revision as of 12:52, 2 May 2007

Law workgroup?

Why is this article in the law workgroup?
It is not even remotely related to law.


Article Checklist for "Diploma mill"
Workgroup category or categories Education Workgroup, Law Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by - Versuri 17:14, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





References

Copyright (c) 2002 Nexus, A Journal of Opinion Nexus, A Journal of Opinion, 2002, 7 Nexus J. Op. 79, 11405 words, ARTICLE: Note: Dinosaur TRACS: The Approaching Conflict Between Establishment Clause Jurisprudence and College Accreditation Procedures, Timothy Sandefur (J.D. 2002, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 1998, Hillsdale College.) Quote from article (concerning Government financing of higher education in USA): But to avoid the problem of "fly by night" schools, the law required (and still requires) that the grants be spent only at accredited institutions. 6 And it permitted the Commissioner (now the Secretary) of Education to draw up a list of accrediting agencies whose judgment in such matters would be respected. 7 But no criteria were set forth by which the Commissioner was to compile such a list: the Commissioner's decision was "essentially ministerial." 8 This was not a mere oversight: both the government and the colleges recognized the need for a wide range of academic freedom from government regulation.