Talk:The Beatles: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
imported>Eric Winesett
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


Get the royalty free pictures somewhere (freeware, gpld, or another CC-license) get them on your PC. Use the upload-file page and upload the images (mind the correct name AND usage of capitals), insert an uploaded image using <nowiki>[[Image:name.ext|thumb|blablabla|left|400px]]</nowiki> or some other setting - trial and error. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:black">&nbsp;<font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span>
Get the royalty free pictures somewhere (freeware, gpld, or another CC-license) get them on your PC. Use the upload-file page and upload the images (mind the correct name AND usage of capitals), insert an uploaded image using <nowiki>[[Image:name.ext|thumb|blablabla|left|400px]]</nowiki> or some other setting - trial and error. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:black">&nbsp;<font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span>
== Citations ==
First of all, aren't there ''too many''? This article is so cluttered with footnote citations that it is almost unreadable. In some sections virtually every sentence has a citation. Based on the criteria listed at [[CZ:Article Mechanics#Citations]], I believe many of these citations can be eliminated. Simple statements of fact (such as release dates of albums) don't need a reference.
Also, we need to check these references, most of which came into Citizendium from Wikipedia. Just looking at the first two is not encouraging. The first points to ''Rolling Stone'' reviews of Beatles albums as a reference for "They are among the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music." Well, sure, RS likes them, but that doesn't prove anything. The second footnote mentions a nonexistent Encarta reference. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 23:51, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:51, 11 May 2007


Article Checklist for "The Beatles"
Workgroup category or categories Music Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 21:57, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





this needs a lot of attention, YUCK it is a mile of text Robert Tito |  Talk  20:42, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

In my initial copy from Wikipeida, I copied from the regular page. When I realized my mistake, I went back and copied from the Wikipedia "edit" page, which brought in the wiki features. Looks better now.Greg Miller-Breetz 21:13, 27 March 2007 (CDT) LOL, well that indeed will look better (didn't peek :) ) Robert Tito |  Talk  21:27, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

©

watch out with the pictures for copyright issues.

The pictures aren't actually there (here) and I don't even know how to load them on the site.Greg Miller-Breetz 22:14, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

Get the royalty free pictures somewhere (freeware, gpld, or another CC-license) get them on your PC. Use the upload-file page and upload the images (mind the correct name AND usage of capitals), insert an uploaded image using [[Image:name.ext|thumb|blablabla|left|400px]] or some other setting - trial and error. Robert Tito |  Talk 

Citations

First of all, aren't there too many? This article is so cluttered with footnote citations that it is almost unreadable. In some sections virtually every sentence has a citation. Based on the criteria listed at CZ:Article Mechanics#Citations, I believe many of these citations can be eliminated. Simple statements of fact (such as release dates of albums) don't need a reference.

Also, we need to check these references, most of which came into Citizendium from Wikipedia. Just looking at the first two is not encouraging. The first points to Rolling Stone reviews of Beatles albums as a reference for "They are among the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music." Well, sure, RS likes them, but that doesn't prove anything. The second footnote mentions a nonexistent Encarta reference. --Eric Winesett 23:51, 11 May 2007 (CDT)