User talk:Karl Hahn: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's wonderful to have you registered here on Citizendium! I hope you find us a welcoming community and that you begin writing and editing very soon. Nancy [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 19:58, 11 February 2007 (CST) | It's wonderful to have you registered here on Citizendium! I hope you find us a welcoming community and that you begin writing and editing very soon. Nancy [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 19:58, 11 February 2007 (CST) | ||
==Mining Wikipedia== | |||
Greetings and thank you for your welcome message. | |||
My question is, what is the policy on mining Wikipedia for content? My impression is that if an author found a good wikipedia article, edited out any POV problems, confirmed referenceds and either found references for the unreferenced statements or eliminated them, and did whatever style cleanup the author might deem reasonable, that such a reworked wikipedia article would be ok to introduce into Citizendium. Do I have that about right? Thanks. [[User:Karl Hahn|Karl Hahn]] 15:46, 14 February 2007 (CST) | |||
What you asked on Nancy's page is absolutely true, please continue with your proposed way of working. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 15:48, 14 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Dr. Sculerati is taking a break; see [[CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:50, 14 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 14 February 2007
It's wonderful to have you registered here on Citizendium! I hope you find us a welcoming community and that you begin writing and editing very soon. Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 19:58, 11 February 2007 (CST)
Mining Wikipedia
Greetings and thank you for your welcome message.
My question is, what is the policy on mining Wikipedia for content? My impression is that if an author found a good wikipedia article, edited out any POV problems, confirmed referenceds and either found references for the unreferenced statements or eliminated them, and did whatever style cleanup the author might deem reasonable, that such a reworked wikipedia article would be ok to introduce into Citizendium. Do I have that about right? Thanks. Karl Hahn 15:46, 14 February 2007 (CST)
What you asked on Nancy's page is absolutely true, please continue with your proposed way of working. Robert Tito | Talk 15:48, 14 February 2007 (CST)
Dr. Sculerati is taking a break; see CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles. --Larry Sanger 16:50, 14 February 2007 (CST)