Talk:Computer network: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Eric M Gearhart
(So much to do...)
imported>Pat Palmer
(idea on history)
Line 30: Line 30:


:Ugh so much to do on here it's friggin crazy! I will try to improve this and the topology article in the future --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 11:40, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
:Ugh so much to do on here it's friggin crazy! I will try to improve this and the topology article in the future --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 11:40, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
==history of networking==
Just as the history of computing needs it own article, I believe that we could use a [[history of networking]] article.  If I had time, I could probably write it (with help).  There is a dramatic story there, starting with how (and why) DARPA funded the original research, then including widespread academic and industry participation, the earliest networks, the early network marketplace, and then its evolution over time into what we have now.  This article could then be the springboard off to more specific articles on specific types of networks, or in general to the [[history of networking]].[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 03:59, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:59, 6 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Computer network"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Markus Baumeister 11:00, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Just some comments on the intentions of the article:

  • It is meant as an overview article forwarding people to the relevant articles. As such it is IMHO already quite long. So major extensions (and maybe also smaller ones) should probably go into an new, linked article.
  • I started with the applications and not the protocols because I think it is more natural for non-CS people to learn what is done with networks, what that means for the qualities networks must have to finally stop to understand things when the technicalities are explained.
  • Any ideas on figures/pictures to show?

--Markus Baumeister 18:33, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

I added a link to Network topology, and threw some rough diagrams up of a bus network and ring network. There's a lot more to add though... --Eric M Gearhart 03:12, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

I just threw 'Category:CZ Live' on this article... it was created from scratch, right? --Eric M Gearhart 10:29, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes. BTW, I moved the topology section to after the QoS bullet as otherwise the "How 'guaranteed' are the above attributes" of QoS doesn't work anymore. Topology is not influenced by QoS. And then there is the more general problem how to distinguish whether topology is a "feature" (I only thought about measurable things for that) or a "categorization". Markus Baumeister 15:15, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Ugh so much to do on here it's friggin crazy! I will try to improve this and the topology article in the future --Eric M Gearhart 11:40, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

history of networking

Just as the history of computing needs it own article, I believe that we could use a history of networking article. If I had time, I could probably write it (with help). There is a dramatic story there, starting with how (and why) DARPA funded the original research, then including widespread academic and industry participation, the earliest networks, the early network marketplace, and then its evolution over time into what we have now. This article could then be the springboard off to more specific articles on specific types of networks, or in general to the history of networking.Pat Palmer 03:59, 6 May 2007 (CDT)