Talk:Applied linguistics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(Wei)
imported>John Stephenson
(article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Applied linguistics
|                cat1 = Linguistics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:44, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
===Material from the main Linguistics page===
===Material from the main Linguistics page===
Some of this could be incorporated into the main applied article. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 23:40, 6 March 2007 (CST)
Some of this could be incorporated into the main applied article. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 23:40, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 02:44, 19 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Applied linguistics"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 03:44, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Material from the main Linguistics page

Some of this could be incorporated into the main applied article. John Stephenson 23:40, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Applied linguistics (from Linguistics)

Main article: Applied linguistics

Whereas theoretical linguistics is concerned with finding and describing generalities both within particular languages and among all languages, applied linguistics takes these results and applies them to other areas. Often applied linguistics refers to the use of linguistic research in language teaching, but this is just one sub-discipline:

  • Research in language teaching: today, 'applied linguistics' is sometimes used to refer to 'second language acquisition', but these are distinct fields, in that SLA involves more theoretical study of the system of language, whereas applied linguistics concerns itself more with teaching and learning. In their approach to the study of learning, applied linguists have increasingly devised their own theories and methodologies, such as the shift towards studying the learner rather than the system of language itself, in contrast to the emphasis within SLA.[1][2]
  1. The applied linguist Vivian Cook has, for example, introduced the term L2 user as distinct from L2 learner (see Cook's page: Background to the L2 User Perspective). The former are active users of the language; the latter those who learn for later use. Cook's view also severs a link to SLA, in that a user's language ability is seen not as an approximation towards native speakers' competence, but as a system in its own right.
  2. See also Wei (2007) for an appeal to focus on the learner rather than the system. Wei L (2007) 'A user-friendly linguistics.' International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17: 117.
  3. The most famous case is Genie, an individual who was deprived of language throughout much of her childhood.
  4. Bishop (2006).
  5. Castagnaro (2006), for review.
  6. Grunwell (1997).