Talk:Elenchus: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Damien Storey
No edit summary
 
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable stating place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under [[Socratic method]]. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate.  [[User:Damien Storey|Damien Storey]] 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST)
{{subpages}}
 
I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under [[Socratic method]]. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate.  [[User:Damien Storey|Damien Storey]] 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 
Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup.  Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
 
:Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared?  (I can't think of one.)  I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
 
::Another related worry:  How many and which articles about philosophers will/should be shared with the History Workgroup. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:11, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 09:41, 26 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Pedagogical technique in which a teacher does not give information directly but instead asks a series of questions, with the result that the student comes either to the desired knowledge by answering the questions or to a deeper awareness of the limits of knowledge. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Classics and Philosophy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under Socratic method. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate. Damien Storey 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup. Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --Larry Sanger 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. Kevin M I Schutte 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Another related worry: How many and which articles about philosophers will/should be shared with the History Workgroup. Kevin M I Schutte 21:11, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Elenchus&oldid=12341"