Talk:Scientific method/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Matthias Brendel No edit summary |
imported>Matthias Brendel |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I suggest to take that article and continue from that article. I suggest that we incorporate from Gareth' article step by step parts, if they are really important and missing from my article. | I suggest to take that article and continue from that article. I suggest that we incorporate from Gareth' article step by step parts, if they are really important and missing from my article. | ||
It is however much worse in spelling and style, since I am | It is however much worse in spelling and style, since I am not a native English. So please copy-edit it, moreover, reformulate the sentences! | ||
The apripriate references are also missing, but those can be obtained from Garet's article. | |||
I just think that my article is a better framework. | |||
--[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 07:43, 6 March 2007 (CST) | --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 07:43, 6 March 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 09:01, 6 March 2007
archives: Talk:Scientific method archive 060307
Alternative article: User:Matthias Brendel/Scientific method
I finished the prototype of my alternative article, which is here:
User:Matthias Brendel/Scientific method
I think it is:
1) Much better structured.
2) Much more textbook like (I had courses in philosophy of science)
3) Much more unbiased.
4) Much more focused on the important things.
5) Much more informative for the laymen, who want to get some quick information, what scientific method consist of.
I suggest to take that article and continue from that article. I suggest that we incorporate from Gareth' article step by step parts, if they are really important and missing from my article.
It is however much worse in spelling and style, since I am not a native English. So please copy-edit it, moreover, reformulate the sentences! The apripriate references are also missing, but those can be obtained from Garet's article.
I just think that my article is a better framework.
--Matthias Brendel 07:43, 6 March 2007 (CST)