CZ Talk:Literature Workgroup: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen |
imported>Stephen Ewen m (→Bonnie Hicks: Indented comments by CM) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I know that Sanger has urged authors to focus on major articles, but circumstances in my life have occurred such that I needed a good grasp of the Singaporean author [[Bonnie Hicks]]. I therefore thought I would contribute this article to maximize my labor. I am unsure exactly how the '''approved article''' nomination works - specifically, whether or not authors as well as editors can so nominate - but I did nominate this article. While the article could go into considerable more detail, I do not think that is appropriate in this case. So here we have my first significant contribution to CZ - one I would never have prior foreseen. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 02:15, 14 January 2007 (CST) | I know that Sanger has urged authors to focus on major articles, but circumstances in my life have occurred such that I needed a good grasp of the Singaporean author [[Bonnie Hicks]]. I therefore thought I would contribute this article to maximize my labor. I am unsure exactly how the '''approved article''' nomination works - specifically, whether or not authors as well as editors can so nominate - but I did nominate this article. While the article could go into considerable more detail, I do not think that is appropriate in this case. So here we have my first significant contribution to CZ - one I would never have prior foreseen. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 02:15, 14 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Though not familiar with Bonnie Hicks, the article looks well-written and well-researched indeed. Will keep an eye on Hicks in the future - yet another advantage of being part of this! --[[User:Carmen Mendez|CM]] 05:29, 14 January 2007 (CST) | :Though not familiar with Bonnie Hicks, the article looks well-written and well-researched indeed. Will keep an eye on Hicks in the future - yet another advantage of being part of this! --[[User:Carmen Mendez|CM]] 05:29, 14 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== Minor revisions == | == Minor revisions == | ||
Revision as of 01:13, 15 January 2007
Thanks for creating this workgroup. I look forwarding to taking part in it.--Jason Sanford 09:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)
Jason, do join the discussion on the Forum Amal Chatterjee 14:05, 21 November 2006 (CST)
Bonnie Hicks
I know that Sanger has urged authors to focus on major articles, but circumstances in my life have occurred such that I needed a good grasp of the Singaporean author Bonnie Hicks. I therefore thought I would contribute this article to maximize my labor. I am unsure exactly how the approved article nomination works - specifically, whether or not authors as well as editors can so nominate - but I did nominate this article. While the article could go into considerable more detail, I do not think that is appropriate in this case. So here we have my first significant contribution to CZ - one I would never have prior foreseen. Stephen Ewen 02:15, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Though not familiar with Bonnie Hicks, the article looks well-written and well-researched indeed. Will keep an eye on Hicks in the future - yet another advantage of being part of this! --CM 05:29, 14 January 2007 (CST)
Minor revisions
I just read through the article, which indeed seems to me to be well-researched and amply documented. I have made just two small stylistic revisions, and I think there may be a few other places where a kind of 'copy-editing' editing could strengthen the overall flow of the article. I don't know enough about Hicks to comment on any substantive matters, though I do have some background in, and occasionally teach, postcolonial literature.
Russell Potter 07:32, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Hi Russel. I addressed your points at Talk:Bonny_Hicks. Thanks. Stephen Ewen 19:08, 14 January 2007 (CST)