CZ:Proposals/Non-comprehensive fair use policy

This proposal has not yet been assigned to any decisionmaking group or decisionmaker(s).
The Proposals Manager will do so soon if and when the proposal or issue is "well formed" (including having a driver).
For now, the proposal record can be found in the new proposals queue.

Driver: Stephen Ewen

Complete explanation

This is a proposal to allow six categories of media to be used under U.S. fair use on Citizendium. The six categories of materials encompass the most commonly used materials under fair use and are widely considered fair use without controversy. Allowing these now will free contributors in a needed way related to both current and future articles. This is not a comprehensive fair use policy, which can be accomplished later, by adding categories to this proposal, for example.

Category One: Coats of Arms, flags, emblems, seals, etc., of administrative entities, political authorities and institutions

With the following caveat:

1. The image should be of very good quality yet only in size sufficient for adequate displaying of information

Category Two: Currency, stamps, vehicle license tags, and closely similar

With the following caveats:

1. The image should be as small as possible to adequately convey the information

Category Three: Company logos, trademarks, copyrighted packaging, and closely similar

With the following two caveats:

1. For logos and trademarks and closely similar, the image should be of very good quality yet only in size sufficient for adequate displaying of information
2. Copyrighted packaging and closely similar should be as small as possible to adequately convey the information

Category Four: Software and website screen captures

With the following two caveats:

1. Partial screen captures should be favored whenever possible
2. The screencapture should be as small as possible to adequately convey the information

Category Five: Book, periodical, and disc covers, and promotional posters, comics/cartoons, and closely similar

With the following caveat:

1. The image should be no larger than necessary to display adequate information

Category Six: Audio and video clips and video screen captures

With the following three caveats:

1. Audio clips should be as small as possible in both length and resolution to convey information. As rules of thumb, use "the 10% and not the heart rule", and don't use song clips over 100 kbbs. For example, in an article about a musical band, you can include approximately 10 second low resolution clips of songs, but if there is a certain section that is the main draw toward people purchasing a certain CD, its "heart", you should be extremely careful about including that clip
2. Video screen captures should be used instead of clips, whenever possible, and neither should be larger than needed to convey the information
3. No encryption mechanism may have been subverted to make audio and video clips (which is illegal in the U.S.)

Universal caveats

1. Items may appear in articles only for uses consistent with U.S. fair use doctrine
2. Items should be obtained from official sources (the originating entity), but may be obtained elsewhere if otherwise unavailable and faithful to the official items

General caveats

1. Contributors are responsible to become familiar with U.S. fair use doctrine before uploading materials to use under fair use, for example, by reading http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html, and upload and use only materials they will be personally responsible for using. The resulting policy should in no way be construed as legal advise
2. The laws of some countries regarding the equivalent of fair use are not consistent with U.S. laws. Contributors should first follow the laws in their own countries. Other contributors where this may not be an issue are probably willing to upload fair use materials for others, in that case
3. If an article is requested to be under dispute resolution, fair use materials should be commented out with <!-- [[Image:Fair use item.jpg]] --> tags until the issue(s) are resolved. In the legal world, offense at use is always the precursor to challenged fair use.

Reasoning

We have current articles that are going to continue to be handicapped without this. Led Zeppelin is the most recent. As well, some contributors have expressed that they are off-put about writing because we lack a policy that permits them the uses stipulated in this proposal.

Implementation

Implementation will be done via a new fair use section of the CZ:Upload-Wizard, and simple, accompanying templates corresponding to the above six categories.

Discussion

A discussion section, to which anyone may contribute.

Let me head-off two possible questions

1. Why are there "very good quality" stipulations in some places but not others?

For instance: It's very important to befittingly depict entities, but publishers get bootleg-worry at high-resolution book cover images.

2. Why didn't you include "promotional photos"?

These can be used under an implied license.[1] That's the whole point of them. Fair use is not needed. For commercial reusers of CZ content - that's a matter we need not consider, but they will.

Stephen Ewen 02:57, 18 February 2008 (CST)

Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Help/policy New proposals List of all proposals Driverless proposals: proposals that lack a champion Discarded proposals: poorly formed proposals Templates: {{Proposal}} | {{Proposal assignment}} | {{Proposals navigation}}

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank): Editorial Council: Active | Finished | Declined Approval and Feedback: Active | Finished | Declined Eduzendium: Active | Finished | Declined Recruitment: Active | Finished | Declined Constabulary: Active | Finished | Declined Executive: Active | Finished | Declined Technical: Active | Finished | Declined PR: Active | Finished | Declined Ad hoc management: Active | Finished | Declined