Talk:Nibiru: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Workgroups: lots of people have already *talked* about it) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Workgroups: indented) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::OK if we can bring in more quality authors, maybe this problem will get addressed?--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | :::OK if we can bring in more quality authors, maybe this problem will get addressed?--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I s'ppose, but who knows? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ::::I s'ppose, but who knows? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 15 March 2010
Pop culture bunk
Created; hot subject "traffic driver" related to 2012.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 17:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Workgroups
I dunno nuttin' about this nutty 2012 business, but I *do* know this: an article about an imaginary planet doesn't belong in the Astronomy Workgroup, so I have removed that category from the metadata. Hayford Peirce 17:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent idea. I have NO idea how to do these categories, sorry if I get the wrong ones. I had been looking for a "Pop culture" category but didn't find one.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 17:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- There are lots of Workgroups that *should* be there but aren't. Maybe the new people who run CZ will someday fix it. Hayford Peirce 17:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- OK if we can bring in more quality authors, maybe this problem will get addressed?--Thomas Wright Sulcer 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I s'ppose, but who knows? Hayford Peirce 18:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)