Talk:Incentre: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (→Bold vs links: new section) |
imported>Richard Pinch m (→Bold vs links: typo) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Bold vs links == | == Bold vs links == | ||
The reason I put several terms in bold in this article is that they serve as anchors for redirects which point back to this page. So for example, at present [[Incircle]] redirects to [[Incentre]] and hence it is pointless to make it a link | The reason I put several terms in bold in this article is that they serve as anchors for redirects which point back to this page. So for example, at present [[Incircle]] redirects to [[Incentre]] and hence it is pointless to make it a link in the Incentre article -- indeed, I doubt that there will ever come a time when those two topics will deserve separate articles. But at present if someone goes to "incircle" and is then redirected here, they will expect to see the word they searched for highlighted in the introduction. Unless there's a good reason not to, I propose to go back to the style I was using before. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] 07:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:15, 26 November 2008
Bold vs links
The reason I put several terms in bold in this article is that they serve as anchors for redirects which point back to this page. So for example, at present Incircle redirects to Incentre and hence it is pointless to make it a link in the Incentre article -- indeed, I doubt that there will ever come a time when those two topics will deserve separate articles. But at present if someone goes to "incircle" and is then redirected here, they will expect to see the word they searched for highlighted in the introduction. Unless there's a good reason not to, I propose to go back to the style I was using before. Richard Pinch 07:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)