International economics: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner mNo edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner (Classical theory/Stolper-Samuelson) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Classical theory=== | ===Classical theory=== | ||
The law of [[comparative advantage]] provides a logical explanation of international trade as the rational consequence of the comparative advantages that arise from inter-regional differences - regardless of how those differences arise. Since its exposition by John Stuart Mill <ref>[http://www.econlib.org/Library/Ricardo/ricP2a.html#Ch.7,%20On%20Foreign%20Trade,%20comparative%20advantage David Ricardo ''On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation'' Chapter 7 John Murray, 1821. Third edition.(First published: 1817)]</ref> the techniques of neo-classical economics have been applied to it to model the patterns of trade that would result from various postulated sources of comparative advantage. It has invariably been found necessary to adopt extremely restrictive (and unrealistic) assumptions in order to make the problem amenable to theoretical analysis. The best-known of the resulting models, the Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) | The law of [[comparative advantage]] provides a logical explanation of international trade as the rational consequence of the comparative advantages that arise from inter-regional differences - regardless of how those differences arise. Since its exposition by John Stuart Mill <ref>[http://www.econlib.org/Library/Ricardo/ricP2a.html#Ch.7,%20On%20Foreign%20Trade,%20comparative%20advantage David Ricardo ''On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation'' Chapter 7 John Murray, 1821. Third edition.(First published: 1817)]</ref> the techniques of neo-classical economics have been applied to it to model the patterns of trade that would result from various postulated sources of comparative advantage. It has invariably been found necessary to adopt extremely restrictive (and unrealistic) assumptions in order to make the problem amenable to theoretical analysis. The best-known of the resulting models, the [[Heckscher-Ohlin]] theorem (H-O) | ||
<ref>[http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch60/T60-8.php The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem]</ref> depends upon the assumptions of no international differences of technology or consumer preferences, no obstacles to pure competition or free trade and no scale economies. On those highly restrictive assumptions, it derives a model of the trade patterns that would arise solely from international differences in the relative abundance of labor and capital (referred to as ''factor endowments''). The resulting theorem states that, on those assumptions, a country with a relative abundance of capital would export capital-intensive products and import labor-intensive products. The theorem proved to be of very limited predictive value, as was demonstrated by what came to be known as the "''Leontief Paradox''" ( the discovery that, despite its capital-rich factor endowment, America was exporting labor-intensive products and importing capital-intensive products <ref>Wassily Leontief, ''Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined'' Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. XCVII p332 September 1953</ref>) Nevertheless the theoretical techniques used in deriving the H-O model were subsequently applied to alternative sets of assumptions to derive further theorems. | <ref>[http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch60/T60-8.php The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem]</ref> depends upon the assumptions of no international differences of technology or consumer preferences, no obstacles to pure competition or free trade and no scale economies. On those highly restrictive assumptions, it derives a model of the trade patterns that would arise solely from international differences in the relative abundance of labor and capital (referred to as ''factor endowments''). The resulting theorem states that, on those assumptions, a country with a relative abundance of capital would export capital-intensive products and import labor-intensive products. The theorem proved to be of very limited predictive value, as was demonstrated by what came to be known as the "''[[Leontief Paradox]]''" ( the discovery that, despite its capital-rich factor endowment, America was exporting labor-intensive products and importing capital-intensive products <ref>Wassily Leontief, ''Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined'' Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. XCVII p332 September 1953</ref>) Nevertheless the theoretical techniques used in deriving the H-O model were subsequently applied to alternative sets of assumptions to derive further theorems. The [[Stolper-Samuelson theorem]] <ref>[http://www.ucd.ie/economic/staff/pneary/pdf/stolpers.pdf The Stolper-Samuelson theorem]</ref> <ref>Wolfgang Stolper and Paul Samuelson ''Protection and Real Wages''' Review of Economic Studies, 9: 58-73. 1941</ref> , which is often described as a corollary of the H-O theorem,was an early example. In its most general form it states that if the price of a good rises (falls) then the price of the factor used intensively in that industry will also rise (fall) while the price of the other factor will fall (rise). In the international trade context for which it was devised it means that trade lowers the real wage of the scarce factor of production, and protection from trade raises it. That is generally interpreted to mean that trade between an industrialized country and a developing country would lower the wages of the unskilled in the industrialized country. Very large numbers of learned papers have been produced in attempts to elaborate on the H-O and Stolper-Samuelson theories, and while academic circles consider many of them to provide valuable insights, they have seldom proved to be of significant explanatory value. | ||
(See also the [[Rybczynski theorem]] <ref>[http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch60/T60-3.php The Rybczynski theorem]</ref> | |||
<ref> Tadeusz Rybczyinski Factor Endowments and Relative Commodity Prices Econometrica volXXII 1955</ref>) | |||
===Modern theory=== | ===Modern theory=== | ||
Revision as of 04:59, 3 January 2008
International economics is concerned with the effects upon economic activity of international differences in productive resources and consumer preferences and the institutions that affect them. It seeks to explain the patterns and consequences of transactions and interactions between the inhabitants of different countries, including trade, investment and migration.
International trade
Classical theory
The law of comparative advantage provides a logical explanation of international trade as the rational consequence of the comparative advantages that arise from inter-regional differences - regardless of how those differences arise. Since its exposition by John Stuart Mill [1] the techniques of neo-classical economics have been applied to it to model the patterns of trade that would result from various postulated sources of comparative advantage. It has invariably been found necessary to adopt extremely restrictive (and unrealistic) assumptions in order to make the problem amenable to theoretical analysis. The best-known of the resulting models, the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem (H-O) [2] depends upon the assumptions of no international differences of technology or consumer preferences, no obstacles to pure competition or free trade and no scale economies. On those highly restrictive assumptions, it derives a model of the trade patterns that would arise solely from international differences in the relative abundance of labor and capital (referred to as factor endowments). The resulting theorem states that, on those assumptions, a country with a relative abundance of capital would export capital-intensive products and import labor-intensive products. The theorem proved to be of very limited predictive value, as was demonstrated by what came to be known as the "Leontief Paradox" ( the discovery that, despite its capital-rich factor endowment, America was exporting labor-intensive products and importing capital-intensive products [3]) Nevertheless the theoretical techniques used in deriving the H-O model were subsequently applied to alternative sets of assumptions to derive further theorems. The Stolper-Samuelson theorem [4] [5] , which is often described as a corollary of the H-O theorem,was an early example. In its most general form it states that if the price of a good rises (falls) then the price of the factor used intensively in that industry will also rise (fall) while the price of the other factor will fall (rise). In the international trade context for which it was devised it means that trade lowers the real wage of the scarce factor of production, and protection from trade raises it. That is generally interpreted to mean that trade between an industrialized country and a developing country would lower the wages of the unskilled in the industrialized country. Very large numbers of learned papers have been produced in attempts to elaborate on the H-O and Stolper-Samuelson theories, and while academic circles consider many of them to provide valuable insights, they have seldom proved to be of significant explanatory value.
(See also the Rybczynski theorem [6] [7])
Modern theory
The gains from trade
Trade policies
Qualifications and extensions
International Finance
Principles
Practical implications
Finance policies
Globalization
References
- ↑ David Ricardo On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation Chapter 7 John Murray, 1821. Third edition.(First published: 1817)
- ↑ The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem
- ↑ Wassily Leontief, Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. XCVII p332 September 1953
- ↑ The Stolper-Samuelson theorem
- ↑ Wolfgang Stolper and Paul Samuelson Protection and Real Wages' Review of Economic Studies, 9: 58-73. 1941
- ↑ The Rybczynski theorem
- ↑ Tadeusz Rybczyinski Factor Endowments and Relative Commodity Prices Econometrica volXXII 1955