CZ:Topic Choice: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(Redirected page to CZ:Content Policy)
Tag: New redirect
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Generally, we may write about whatever we like in the ''Citizendium.''  There are, however, a few constraints on the choice of article topic:
#REDIRECT [[CZ:Content_Policy]]
 
* ''Encyclopedia topics.''  Topics should be plausible ''as'' encyclopedia article topics.  This excludes, for example, topics expressing personal opinions (e.g., "Why I think God does not exist"), or highly complicated topics that reflect original research (e.g., "Fruit production in France, Turkmenistan, and Australia").
 
* ''Redundancy.''  If one topic is quite similar to another--for example, is just a variant on the name--then the less common topic name should in many cases be redirected to the more common topic name.  Thus, for example [[Great War]] redirects to [[World War I]].
 
Unlike in Wikipedia, there is no requirement on the ''Citizendium'' that article topics be "notable."  That is, we do not exclude topics solely on the ground that their topics do not strike contributors as being significant or important.  We recognize that what may be completely trivial to one person might in fact be quite important to another, and that as a criterion "notability" is too vague to admit of consistent use. 
 
IMPORTANT NOTE: Our newest guidance usually excludes articles about people known only for committing acts of violence, including mass shooters; see [[Forum_Talk:Content#EDITOR-IN-CHIEF_RESPONSE:_We_shouldn't_have_articles_on_the_lives_of_people_who_are_*only*_known_for_taking_life|this Forum discussion]].  Exceptions may be accepted with the Editor in Chief's consent.
 
{{Content Policy}}
[[Category:Policies]]

Latest revision as of 11:27, 19 January 2023

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ:Topic_Choice&oldid=877378"