Talk:Unidentified flying object: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Thanks for not making it a conspiracy theory) |
imported>Hayford Peirce m (Talk:UFO moved to Talk:Unidentified flying object: more explicit) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 10:18, 22 July 2010
|
| Metadata here |
Added metadata and some notes
This is a reasonable start for a collaborative project, and, blessedly, does not read like a conspiracy theory. It may need to be contextualized with articles on extraterrestrial intelligence and, indeed, expansions on radar, technical and imagery intelligence/photogrammetry, and phenomena of witnessed observation.
As the text began, there seemed a strong implication that UFO necessarily equated to alien. I'm certainly not dismissing the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), but I think that a fair article also has to comment on the possibility of incorrect reports. The more dramatic the claim, the better the evidence need be.
The article may need to address the possibility that some sightings were highly classified experiments, and certainly other phenomena with an obscure but natural origin. I did provide some CIA references that indicate that at least some observations suggest something was present and could not be explained with the knowledge of the time. Howard C. Berkowitz 15:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)