Talk:Hash (cryptography): Difference between revisions
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
imported>Sandy Harris (→Help) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Help == | == Help == | ||
This article is nowhere near complete, but I'm almost the only author so far and it is about as far as I can take it. It needs various things added that either I do understand well enough to tackle or am not much interested in, often both. Anyone care to improve it? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 06:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | This article is nowhere near complete, but I'm almost the only author so far and it is about as far as I can take it. It needs various things added that either I do understand well enough to tackle or am not much interested in, often both. Anyone care to improve it? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 06:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Also, since there have been 64 proposals submitted, the AHS section is likely to get very long. Having the [[Block cipher#The AES generation]] section in that article makes sense; those ciphers are actually in service. AHS is not; target date for the standard is 2012. I started the analogous section here, but now think it should move to its own article. Other opinions? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 11:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:25, 30 November 2008
Created this, will make cryptographic hash and message digest redirects to it. Discussion at Talk:Block_cipher#Hashes_of_various_sorts. Sandy Harris 11:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Help
This article is nowhere near complete, but I'm almost the only author so far and it is about as far as I can take it. It needs various things added that either I do understand well enough to tackle or am not much interested in, often both. Anyone care to improve it? Sandy Harris 06:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Also, since there have been 64 proposals submitted, the AHS section is likely to get very long. Having the Block cipher#The AES generation section in that article makes sense; those ciphers are actually in service. AHS is not; target date for the standard is 2012. I started the analogous section here, but now think it should move to its own article. Other opinions? Sandy Harris 11:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)