CZ:Dispute Resolution: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Conflict between editors and authors == | == Conflict between editors and authors == | ||
'''The extent of editor authority.''' One of the reasons we have editors on the ''Citizendium'' is precisely to avoid conflict, by placing decisionmaking authority in the hands of experts. Editors do, therefore, have broad authority over issues about articles in the areas to which they have been assigned. Note that they ''do not'' have authority over articles assigned to other workgroups; for those articles, they act as rank-and-file authors. There are cases, however, in which | |||
How is the decision made while consulting an authority for a resolution? The | How is the decision made while consulting an authority for a resolution? The | ||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
What to do if there is a difference in interpretation of existing policy | What to do if there is a difference in interpretation of existing policy | ||
What to do if there is disagreement about what workgroup an article is assigned to | |||
Revision as of 13:10, 29 August 2007
This is a draft proposal under construction. It might contain good advice but it does not contain established rules, unless they are repeated from elsewhere.
What to do if you have a disagreement
Definitions. A disagreement occurs when you want the article to read one way, and someone else wants it to read another way. A disagreement blows up into a conflict when both sides will not back down from their positions, which they actively defend.
Dialogue toward compromise. Not all disagreements need to become full-blown conflicts, and conflicts can be de-escalated to mere disagreements. When faced with a disagreement, the first thing to do--regardless of the participants--is to engage in a constructive, friendly dialogue on the talk page, aimed at compromise.
Dialogue professionally, and bear in mind that your dialogue is not necessarily determinative. Please make sure that you behave professionally as you discuss things. Bear in mind that your dialogue does not necessarily determine the outcome of your disagreement. If one side cannot persuade the other, or if you cannot arrive at a compromise, the issue will be decided by other Citizendium community mechanisms. We ask only that you trust that these mechanisms will result in a fair and intelligent decision.
If a conflict cannot be resolved by dialogue
Declare impasse and consult an editor or constable. Either party can, at any time on an article's talk page, declare that the conflict cannot be resolved through dialogue. The next step is for one of the parties to the conflict to ask either an editor in a workgroup overseeing the article to decide which position should prevail, or--in certain other cases--a constable.
What issues do editors handle? Editors, broadly speaking, have authority over content issues. These include purely factual issues, typically resolved by reference to "objective" sources; neutrality (i.e., that a piece of text is biased, or that some other text needs to be added in order to make a paragraph neutral); the article title; copyediting matters; article level; copyright matters; etc.
What issues do constables handle? Constables, broadly speaking, have authority over behavior issues, but it is unlikely that you will have a dispute per se about such issues. Indeed, since you should avoid characterizing your fellow Citizens' behavior on the wiki (see our Professionalism policy), you probably should not be arguing over behavior. If you are bothered by another Citizen, you should e-mail the Constabulary (at constables [at] citizendium.org). But constables may also be consulted about certain other simpler matters that editors need not be bothered by; for example, you can ask a constable to delete certain articles on their own recognizance. Constables may also be consulted about what Citizendium articles are not as well as about our Policy on Self-Promotion.
Conflict between editors and authors
The extent of editor authority. One of the reasons we have editors on the Citizendium is precisely to avoid conflict, by placing decisionmaking authority in the hands of experts. Editors do, therefore, have broad authority over issues about articles in the areas to which they have been assigned. Note that they do not have authority over articles assigned to other workgroups; for those articles, they act as rank-and-file authors. There are cases, however, in which
How is the decision made while consulting an authority for a resolution? The
What to do if there is no policy
What to do if there is seems to be no procedure for this type of conflict
What to do if the other person will not play along with the procedure
What to do in case of disagreement about purview
What to do if there is a difference in interpretation of existing policy
What to do if there is disagreement about what workgroup an article is assigned to
(1a) Disagreements handled by individual editors: initial disagreement about article content. The grounds for disagreement are many: purely factual, typically resolved by reference to "objective" sources; neutrality (i.e., that a piece of text is biased, or that some other text needs to be added in order to make a paragraph neutral); article title; copyediting matters; article level; copyright matters; etc.
(1b) Disagreements handled by workgroups (when established?): disagreement with decisions made about the items in (1a), i.e., appeals; about whether a person is or is not qualified to be an editor; and about templates and rules established by the workgroup.
(1c) Disagreements handled by the Editorial Council: those about content policy that has not yet been settled.
Disagreements handled by
How to avoid conflict: determine first that there is actually a substantive disagreement that cannot be resolved by dialogue or compromise.
How is the decision made while consulting an authority for a resolution? The
What to do if there is no policy
What to do if there is seems to be no procedure for this type of conflict
What to do if the other person will not play along with the procedure
What to do in case of disagreement about purview
What to do if there is a difference in interpretation of existing policy
To do: establish workgroups (i.e., establish the process through which workgroups make decision)