User:Aleksander Stos/ComplexNumberAdvanced: Difference between revisions
imported>Aleksander Stos |
imported>Aleksander Stos |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:<math>z=r(\cos\theta + i\sin \theta),</math> where ''r'' traditionally stands for |''z''|. | :<math>z=r(\cos\theta + i\sin \theta),</math> where ''r'' traditionally stands for |''z''|. | ||
This is the ''trigonometric form'' of the complex number ''z''. If we adopt convention that <math>\theta \in [0,2\pi)</math> then such <math>\theta</math> is unique and called the ''argument'' of ''z''.<ref>In literature the convention <math>\theta\in (-\pi,\pi]</math> is found as well.</ref> | This is the ''trigonometric form'' of the complex number ''z''. If we adopt convention that <math>\theta \in [0,2\pi)</math> then such <math>\theta</math> is unique and called the ''argument'' of ''z''.<ref>In literature the convention <math>\theta\in (-\pi,\pi]</math> is found as well.</ref> | ||
The equality of two complex numbers <math>z_1=r_1e^{i\theta_1}</math> and <math>z_2=r_2e^{i\theta_2}</math> is equivalent to <math>r_1=r_2</math> and <math>\theta_1=\theta_2+2k\pi</math> for certain integer ''k''. | |||
Graphically, the number <math>\theta</math> is the (oriented) angle between the ''x''-axis and the interval containing 0 and ''z''. | Graphically, the number <math>\theta</math> is the (oriented) angle between the ''x''-axis and the interval containing 0 and ''z''. | ||
Closely related is the exponential notation. | Closely related is the exponential notation. | ||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
Consequently, any (non-zero) <math> z\in \mathbb{C}</math> can be written as | Consequently, any (non-zero) <math> z\in \mathbb{C}</math> can be written as | ||
:<math> z= r e^{i\theta}</math> with the same ''r'' and <math>theta</math> as above. | :<math> z= r e^{i\theta}</math> with the same ''r'' and <math>theta</math> as above. | ||
This is called the ''exponential form'' of the complex number ''z''. | This is called the ''exponential form'' of the complex number ''z''.<ref>The equivalence of two complex numbers can be checked as in the trigonometric form case.</ref> | ||
It is well-adapted to perform multiplications. Indeed, for any <math>z_1=r_1e^{i\theta_1}</math> and <math>z_2=r_2e^{i\theta_2}</math> we have | It is well-adapted to perform multiplications. Indeed, for any <math>z_1=r_1e^{i\theta_1}</math> and <math>z_2=r_2e^{i\theta_2}</math> we have | ||
* <math>z_1 z_2= r_1r_2 e^{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}</math> | * <math>z_1 z_2= r_1r_2 e^{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}</math> | ||
* <math>\frac{z_1}{z_2} = \frac{r_1}{r_2} e^{i(\theta_1-\theta_2)},</math> provided <math>z_2\not=0.</math> | * <math>\frac{z_1}{z_2} = \frac{r_1}{r_2} e^{i(\theta_1-\theta_2)},</math> provided <math>z_2\not=0.</math> | ||
The following particular case of complex multiplication is well-know as the [[de Moivre]] formula | The following particular case of complex multiplication is well-know as the [[de Moivre]] formula | ||
<ref>It is commonly used to ''linearise'' powers of trigonometric functions in integrals.</ref> | |||
:<math> (cos\theta+i\sin\theta)^n = \cos(n\theta)+i\sin(n\theta)</math> | :<math> (cos\theta+i\sin\theta)^n = \cos(n\theta)+i\sin(n\theta)</math> | ||
[[Image:Graphical_multiplication1.png|thumb|200px|right|Fig 2. Multiplication by <math>i</math> amounts to rotation by 90 degrees.]] | [[Image:Graphical_multiplication1.png|thumb|200px|right|Fig 2. Multiplication by <math>i</math> amounts to rotation by 90 degrees.]] | ||
Graphically, multiplication by a constant complex number <math>z=re^{i\theta}</math> amounts to the rotation by <math>\theta</math> and the [[homothety]] of ratio ''r''. In particular, the multiplication by ''i'' amounts to the rotation by the right angle (counter-clockwise), see Fig. 2. | Graphically, multiplication by a constant complex number <math>z=re^{i\theta}</math> amounts to the rotation by <math>\theta</math> and the [[homothety]] of ratio ''r''. In particular, the multiplication by ''i'' amounts to the rotation by the right angle (counter-clockwise), see Fig. 2. | ||
===References=== | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
===Complex roots=== | ===Complex roots=== |
Revision as of 08:58, 13 August 2007
This is an experimental draft. For a brief description of this project click here.
Complex numbers are defined as ordered pairs of reals:
Such pairs can be added and multiplied as follows
- addition:
- multiplication:
with the addition and multiplication is the field of complex numbers. From another of view, with complex additions and multiplication by real numbers is a 2-dimesional vector space.
To perform basic computations it is convenient to introduce the imaginary unit, i=(0,1).[1] It has the property Any complex number can be written as (this is often called the algebraic form) and vice-versa. The numbers a and b are called the real part and the imaginary part of z, respectively. We denote and Notice that i makes the multiplication quite natural:
The square root of number in the denominator in the above formula is called the modulus of z and denoted by ,
We have for any two complex numbers and
- provided
For we define also , the conjugate, by Then we have
- provided
Geometric interpretation
Complex numbers may be naturally represented on the complex plane, where corresponds to the point (x,y), see the fig. 1.
The modulus is just the distance from the point and the origin. More generally, is the distance between the two given points. Furthermore, the conjugation is just the symmetry with respect to the x-axis.
Trigonometric and exponential form
As the graphical representation suggests, any complex number z=a+bi of modulus 1 (i.e. a point from the unit circle) can be written as for some So actually any (non-null) can be represented as
- where r traditionally stands for |z|.
This is the trigonometric form of the complex number z. If we adopt convention that then such is unique and called the argument of z.[2] The equality of two complex numbers and is equivalent to and for certain integer k. Graphically, the number is the (oriented) angle between the x-axis and the interval containing 0 and z. Closely related is the exponential notation. If we define complex exponential as
then it may be shown that
Consequently, any (non-zero) can be written as
- with the same r and as above.
This is called the exponential form of the complex number z.[3] It is well-adapted to perform multiplications. Indeed, for any and we have
- provided
The following particular case of complex multiplication is well-know as the de Moivre formula [4]
Graphically, multiplication by a constant complex number amounts to the rotation by and the homothety of ratio r. In particular, the multiplication by i amounts to the rotation by the right angle (counter-clockwise), see Fig. 2.
References
Complex roots
Any non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has a complex root. This result is known as the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Consequently, any complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots (counted with multiplicities). In particular, the equation
- ,
where z is the variable and a a non-zero constant has exactly n solutions. They are called nth (complex) roots of a. If a is written in the exponential form, then the n roots of a, denoted as , are given by
It follows that the roots form a regular n-sided polygon centered at the origin. In particular, the cubic roots of 1 (with n=3) are {}.