Talk:Paradise Lost: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Wyatt
No edit summary
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
Shakespeare has artillery in ''King John''. Ignorance, or a different attitude to anachronism? Is this relevant? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 15:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Shakespeare has artillery in ''King John''. Ignorance, or a different attitude to anachronism? Is this relevant? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 15:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
:I think the idea of artillery in PL is ridiculous rather than anachronistic.  As for ''King John'', you might, if you were very ingenious, argue that Shakespeare is using artillery in its old sense of any engine of war (OED), but it is more likely it is just plain not caring. --[[User:Martin Wyatt|Martin Wyatt]] 21:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
:I think the idea of artillery in PL is ridiculous rather than anachronistic.  As for ''King John'', you might, if you were very ingenious, argue that Shakespeare is using artillery in its old sense of any engine of war (OED), but it is more likely it is just plain not caring. --[[User:Martin Wyatt|Martin Wyatt]] 21:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
::I didn't mean he used the ''word'' "artillery". If memory serves right, he talks about "cannon", but don't quote me on that.
::Anyway, it's clear from what you say that it's not relevant to this article. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 09:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:11, 21 January 2014

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  John Milton's epic in blank verse, long considered the greatest poem in English. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Literature [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  English
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Shakespeare has artillery in King John. Ignorance, or a different attitude to anachronism? Is this relevant? Peter Jackson 15:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I think the idea of artillery in PL is ridiculous rather than anachronistic. As for King John, you might, if you were very ingenious, argue that Shakespeare is using artillery in its old sense of any engine of war (OED), but it is more likely it is just plain not caring. --Martin Wyatt 21:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I didn't mean he used the word "artillery". If memory serves right, he talks about "cannon", but don't quote me on that.
Anyway, it's clear from what you say that it's not relevant to this article. Peter Jackson 09:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Paradise_Lost&oldid=770791"