User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Summary: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (restructured) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | {{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | ||
:::;;;<blockquote>''What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints? — [http://dmm.biologists.org/content/2/5-6/201 Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel]''</blockquote> | |||
<BIG> | <BIG> | ||
Wikis | Wikis | ||
*provide the opportunity to structure published items | *provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more [[context]]ually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for | ||
*are compatible with any mode of peer review tested so far | *are compatible with any mode of [[peer review]] tested so far | ||
*can be integrated with every step of the research cycle, so as to highlight research as a process and improve | *can be integrated with every step of the [[research cycle]], so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility | ||
</BIG> | </BIG> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:41, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo
What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints? — Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel
Wikis
- provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more contextually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for
- are compatible with any mode of peer review tested so far
- can be integrated with every step of the research cycle, so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility