User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Summary: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:41, 22 November 2023

The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.

What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints? — Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel

Wikis

provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more contextually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for
are compatible with any mode of peer review tested so far
can be integrated with every step of the research cycle, so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{AccountNotLive}}
 {{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
-<center>
+:::;;;<blockquote>''What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints?&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[http://dmm.biologists.org/content/2/5-6/201 Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel]''</blockquote>
-If you want to make scholarly publishing editable, wikis provide a viable way to do so.
-</center>
+<BIG>
+Wikis
+*provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more [[context]]ually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for
+*are compatible with any mode of [[peer review]] tested so far
+*can be integrated with every step of the [[research cycle]], so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility
+</BIG>