Template:CharterVote2/14/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (punctuation) |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Agree. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | Agree. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Agree. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 22:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Agree. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Agree. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Provided the current (check the time stamp) consensus holds on Article 10, I agree. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 18 July 2010
< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE
As per Daniel's suggestion:
Specialist material—including original research—shall be welcome within limits set by the Editorial Council. Specialist material shall be put into context with background information and non-specialist material.
Agree. Russell D. Jones 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. D. Matt Innis 22:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. --Daniel Mietchen 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Provided the current (check the time stamp) consensus holds on Article 10, I agree. Joe Quick 04:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)