Template:CharterVote2/14/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Agree with Daniel's suggestion)
 
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
As per Daniel's suggestion:
As per Daniel's suggestion:


Specialist material including original research shall be welcome within limits set by the Editorial Council.  Specialist material shall be put into context with background information and non-specialist material.
Specialist material—including original research—shall be welcome within limits set by the Editorial Council.  Specialist material shall be put into context with background information and non-specialist material.


Agree.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 22:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Provided the current (check the time stamp) consensus holds on Article 10, I agree. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:32, 18 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE
As per Daniel's suggestion:

Specialist material—including original research—shall be welcome within limits set by the Editorial Council. Specialist material shall be put into context with background information and non-specialist material.

Agree. Russell D. Jones 21:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree. D. Matt Innis 22:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree. --Daniel Mietchen 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Provided the current (check the time stamp) consensus holds on Article 10, I agree. Joe Quick 04:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)