CZ:Proposals/Editorial Council: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk m (→Create workgroup style guides: update date for action by EC) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Username of driver = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | |Username of driver = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | ||
|Next step = Submit to the Editorial Council for approval, hopefully by acclamation | |Next step = Submit to the Editorial Council for approval, hopefully by acclamation | ||
|Target date for next step = | |Target date for next step = May 1 or when the Editorial Council comes back online | ||
|Notes = | |Notes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|Username of driver = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | |Username of driver = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | ||
|Next step = Submit to Editorial Council after new Council is empanelled | |Next step = Submit to Editorial Council after new Council is empanelled | ||
|Target date for next step = | |Target date for next step = May 1 or when the Editorial Council comes back online | ||
|Notes = | |Notes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 17:58, 24 April 2008
These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the Editorial Council.
Self-Correction Policy
Summary: The Citizendium should adopt a policy that requires that we list all factual errors in previous versions of our articles--including unapproved articles--at the bottom of an article. This is the same standard that newspapers and other legitimate periodicals use. We are clearly obligated to adopt the same policy. Doing so will earn us good will from the public and increase our credibility considerably.
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Citing CZ article by authors
Summary: An author X, who wants to cite a Citizendium article he contributed to, should do so in a form like "Authors and X (2008) Life ..." (summary written by Proposals Manager)
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Medical Disclaimers
Summary: Add a disclaimer to drug and medical condition pages
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages
Summary: By popular demand, we would, to a limited extent, allow Citizens to take authorship credit of articles. This would (for now) take the form of a template placed at the bottom of the page, which would, in small and unobtrusive print, list the contributors to an article in alphabetical order. Contributors would add themselves. To avoid issues about what counts as an "important" edit, a person could take co-authorship credit for adding at least two sentences, and five people who have to be on the list before any names were displayed. We would try this out in just four workgroups (the template would be removed from articles in any other workgroup).
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Create workgroup style guides
Summary: To promote coherent style and subsections within each workgroup, aid new users with examples of equations, drawings and other how-to items
| ||||||
| Complete proposal | ||||||
| Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only) | |
|
Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):
|